Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 5

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 5

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 532 MHz vs 200 MHz Around 2.8x higher GPU clock speed
Front view of Intel N4200

Reasons to consider the
Intel N4200

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Oct, 2012 Release date over 3 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Features Key features of the OMAP 5  vs N4200 

clock speed

OMAP 5
2 GHz
N4200
1.1 GHz

gpu clock speed

OMAP 5
532 MHz
N4200
200 MHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 5  vs
N4200 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 4.88W

details

OMAP 5  vs
N4200 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 28 nm 14 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX 544MP2 Intel® HD Graphics 505
GPU clock speed 532 MHz 200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR-266
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 4,266.66 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Texas Instruments OMAP 5
Report a correction
Intel N4200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus