Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 5

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 5

Report a correction
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Sep, 2012 Release date more than a month later
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 65% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 532 MHz More than 20% higher GPU clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Features Key features of the OMAP 5  vs Core i3 3220 

clock speed

OMAP 5
2 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz

gpu clock speed

OMAP 5
532 MHz
Core i3 3220
650 MHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 5  vs
Core i3 3220 
Clock speed 2 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 44.69W

details

OMAP 5  vs
Core i3 3220 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 28 nm 22 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX 544MP2 Intel® HD Graphics 2500
GPU clock speed 532 MHz 650 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
DDR-266
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 4,266.66 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Texas Instruments OMAP 5
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus