Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 5

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 5

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Atom E3845

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3845

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date over a year later

Features Key features of the OMAP 5  vs Atom E3845 

clock speed

OMAP 5
2 GHz
Atom E3845
1.91 GHz

gpu clock speed

OMAP 5
532 MHz
Atom E3845
542 MHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 5  vs
Atom E3845 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.91 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 8.13W

details

OMAP 5  vs
Atom E3845 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 28 nm 22 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX 544MP2 HD
GPU clock speed 532 MHz 542 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1333
DDR-266
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 4,266.66 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Texas Instruments OMAP 5
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3845
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus