Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470) vs the Intel Core i7 4770.

Front view of Intel Core i7 4770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 90% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Marginally newer Jun, 2013 vs Jul, 2012 Release date 11 months later

Features Key features of the OMAP 4 (4470)  vs Core i7 4770 

clock speed

OMAP 4 (4470)
1.8 GHz
Core i7 4770
3.4 GHz

gpu clock speed

OMAP 4 (4470)
384 MHz
Core i7 4770
350 MHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 4 (4470)  vs
Core i7 4770 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is hyperthreaded No Yes

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX544 Intel® HD Graphics 4600
GPU clock speed 384 MHz 350 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel

details

OMAP 4 (4470)  vs
Core i7 4770 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 8
Manufacture process 45 nms 22 nms

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 68.25W
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus