0 Comments
| | Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) |
Released July, 2012
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)
| | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz |
VS
Released October, 2012
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)
- 1.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)
| | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm | | More cores 4 |
| | More threads 4 | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.72 GHz |
by Andrew-Ku (Oct, 2012)Each core can now decode up to three instructions per clock cycle (up from two), similar to the Cortex-A15 design.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.72 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2012 | vs | Jul, 2012 | Release date 3 months later | |||
Benchmarks Real world tests of OMAP 4 (4470) vs Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)
SunSpider 0.9.1
OMAP 4 (4470)
1,602.2 ms
Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)
1,227 ms
BrowserMark
OMAP 4 (4470)
131,592
Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)
125,136
GeekBench
OMAP 4 (4470)
1,379
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | OMAP 4 (4470) | vs | Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.72 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 1.72 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | N/A | N/A | |
details | OMAP 4 (4470) | vs | Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 28 nm | |
| Architecture | ARM | ARM | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | PowerVR SGX544 | Adreno 320 | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470) | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
| VS | |
| 265 € | 247 € | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
| VS | |
| $107 | $52 | |
| Intel Celeron N2807 vs Atom E3845 | ||
| VS | |
| 236 € | 236 € | |
| Intel Core i5 4460T vs 4430S | ||
| VS | |
| 370 € | 322 € | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| 4 035 € | 327 € | |
| Intel Xeon X5670 vs X3470 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
| VS | |
| 60 € | 743 € | |
| AMD A10 4600M vs Intel Core i5 3210M | ||
-front.jpg)
-front.jpg)
-front.jpg)
-front.jpg)
-front.jpg)
-front.jpg)