Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.72 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Jul, 2012 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of OMAP 4 (4470) vs Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)

SunSpider 0.9.1

BrowserMark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 4 (4470)  vs
Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 1.72 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A

details

OMAP 4 (4470)  vs
Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) 
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm
Architecture ARM ARM

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX544 Adreno 320

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)
Report a correction
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus