Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470) vs Intel Core i7 4770 |
Released July, 2012
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
-front.jpg)
Reasons to buy the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)
 | Slightly higher GPU clock speed 384 MHz |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i7 4770
| | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | More advanced architecture x86-64 | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.85 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
-front.jpg)
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly higher GPU clock speed | 384 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | Around 10% higher GPU clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 90% higher clock speed | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | ARM | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.85 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 more threads | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.01 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Jul, 2012 | Release date 11 months later | |||
-front.jpg)
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of OMAP 4 (4470) vs Core i7 4770
GeekBench
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | OMAP 4 (4470) | vs | Core i7 4770 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 4.01 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | N/A | 68.25W | |
details | OMAP 4 (4470) | vs | Core i7 4770 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ARM | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 8 | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | PowerVR SGX544 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| GPU clock speed | 384 MHz | 350 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
 Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 4770 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | $240 | |
| 4770 vs 3770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | $305 | |
| 4770 vs 4790 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | $248 | |
| 4770 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | $160 | |
| 4770 vs 4570 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | $401 | |
| 4770 vs 6500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | $200 | |
| 4770 vs 4590 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | $190 | |
| 4770 vs 4460 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
