0 Comments
| Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470) vs Intel Core i5 4570 |
Released July, 2012
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470)
![]() | Slightly higher GPU clock speed 384 MHz |
VS
Released April, 2013
Intel Core i5 4570
- 3.2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Core i5 4570
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 | ![]() | More cores 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Slightly higher GPU clock speed | 384 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | Around 10% higher GPU clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 80% higher clock speed | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | ARM | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Newer | Apr, 2013 | vs | Jul, 2012 | Release date 9 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of OMAP 4 (4470) vs Core i5 4570
GeekBench
OMAP 4 (4470)
1,379
Core i5 4570
10,583
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | OMAP 4 (4470) | vs | Core i5 4570 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | PowerVR SGX544 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
GPU clock speed | 384 MHz | 350 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
details | OMAP 4 (4470) | vs | Core i5 4570 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | ARM | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | N/A | 68.25W |
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4470) ![]() | Intel Core i5 4570 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | $180 | |
4570 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | $190 | |
4570 vs 4460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | $200 | |
4570 vs 4590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | ||
4570 vs 5545M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | $168 | |
4570 vs 3570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | $240 | |
4570 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$160 | $176 | |
4570 vs 4670 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||