Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460)

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460) vs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual).

Default view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual) vs the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460).

Benchmarks Real world tests of OMAP 4 (4460) vs Snapdragon 400 (Dual)

GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt Offscreen

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 4 (4460)  vs
Snapdragon 400 (Dual) 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX540 Adreno 305
GPU clock speed 384 MHz 450 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel

details

OMAP 4 (4460)  vs
Snapdragon 400 (Dual) 
Threads 2 2
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm
Architecture ARM ARM

power consumption

Typical power consumption 0.81W N/A
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460)
Report a correction
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus