Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460)

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460) vs the Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30L).

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30L)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30L)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30L) vs the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460).

Benchmarks Real world tests of OMAP 4 (4460) vs Tegra 3 (T30L)

GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt Offscreen

OMAP 4 (4460)
28.7 fps

SunSpider 0.9.1

OMAP 4 (4460)
1,988.1 ms
Tegra 3 (T30L)
1,785 ms

BrowserMark

OMAP 4 (4460)
97,381
Tegra 3 (T30L)
111,763

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 4 (4460)  vs
Tegra 3 (T30L) 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX540 ULP GeForce
GPU clock speed 384 MHz 416 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel

details

OMAP 4 (4460)  vs
Tegra 3 (T30L) 
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 45 nm 40 nm
Architecture ARM ARM

power consumption

Typical power consumption 0.81W N/A
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460)
Report a correction
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30L)
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus