Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460)

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460)

Report a correction
Slightly lower typical power consumption 0.81W vs 2.44W 3x lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year vs 0.72 $/year 3x lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year vs 2.63 $/year 3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Atom Z2560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z2560

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Feb, 2013 vs Oct, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of OMAP 4 (4460) vs Atom Z2560

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 4 (4460)  vs
Atom Z2560 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.65 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.65 GHz 1.6 GHz

power consumption

TDP 1W 3W
Annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year 0.72 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year 2.63 $/year
Typical power consumption 0.81W 2.44W

details

OMAP 4 (4460)  vs
Atom Z2560 
Architecture ARM x86
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX540 Integrated
GPU clock speed 384 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4460)
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z2560
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus