Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430)

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430) vs the ST-Ericsson NovaThor LP9600.

Front view of ST-Ericsson NovaThor LP9600

Reasons to consider the
ST-Ericsson NovaThor LP9600

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ST-Ericsson NovaThor LP9600 vs the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430).

Features Key features of the OMAP 4 (4430)  vs NovaThor LP9600 

clock speed

OMAP 4 (4430)
1.2 GHz
NovaThor LP9600
2.5 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 4 (4430)  vs
NovaThor LP9600 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX540 IMG PowerVR Series 6

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel

details

OMAP 4 (4430)  vs
NovaThor LP9600 
Threads 2 2
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm
Architecture ARM ARM

power consumption

Typical power consumption 0.81W N/A
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430)
Report a correction
ST-Ericsson NovaThor LP9600
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus