Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430)

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430) vs the Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260).

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260)

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260) vs the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430).

Benchmarks Real world tests of OMAP 4 (4430) vs Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260)

SunSpider 0.9.1

OMAP 4 (4430)
1,503.5 ms

BrowserMark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 4 (4430)  vs
Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260) 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.03 GHz 1.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.03 GHz 1.57 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 0.81W N/A

details

OMAP 4 (4430)  vs
Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260) 
Threads 2 2
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Architecture ARM ARM

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label PowerVR SGX540 Adreno 220

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430)
Report a correction
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260)
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus