Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430)

Reasons to consider the
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.2 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Apr, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.03 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel A100 Series A110

Reasons to consider the
Intel A100 Series A110

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel A100 Series A110 vs the Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430).

Features Key features of the OMAP 4 (4430)  vs A100 Series A110 

clock speed

overclocked clock speed (air)

OMAP 4 (4430)
1.03 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

OMAP 4 (4430)  vs
A100 Series A110 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 0.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.03 GHz 0.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 0.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.03 GHz 0.8 GHz

details

OMAP 4 (4430)  vs
A100 Series A110 
Threads 2 1
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm

power consumption

TDP 1W 3W
Annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year 0.72 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year 2.63 $/year
Typical power consumption 0.81W 2.44W
Texas Instruments OMAP 4 (4430)
Report a correction
Intel A100 Series A110
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus