Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Samsung Exynos 5 Octa

Reasons to consider the
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 8 vs 2 6 more cores; run more applications at once
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Itanium 9015

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9015

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 0.5 MB 24x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 6 MB/core vs 0.06 MB/core 96x more l2 cache per core
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor

Features Key features of the Exynos 5 Octa  vs Itanium 9015 

clock speed

Exynos 5 Octa
1.6 GHz
Itanium 9015
1.4 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Exynos 5 Octa  vs
Itanium 9015 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Octa core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Latest DirectX 11.x N/A
GPU clock speed 528 MHz N/A

details

Exynos 5 Octa  vs
Itanium 9015 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 12 MB
L2 cache per core 0.06 MB/core 6 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 90 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 84.5W
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 9015
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus