Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Samsung Exynos 5 Octa

Reasons to consider the
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa

Report a correction
More cores 8 vs 2 6 more cores; run more applications at once
Newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Core i3 2102

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2102

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 95% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz vs 528 MHz More than 60% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.06 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Exynos 5 Octa  vs Core i3 2102 

clock speed

Exynos 5 Octa
1.6 GHz
Core i3 2102
3.1 GHz

L2 cache

gpu clock speed

Exynos 5 Octa
528 MHz
Core i3 2102
850 MHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Exynos 5 Octa  vs
Core i3 2102 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Octa core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
GPU clock speed 528 MHz 850 MHz

details

Exynos 5 Octa  vs
Core i3 2102 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.06 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 52.81W
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 2102
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus