Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Samsung Exynos 5 Octa

Reasons to consider the
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Opteron 6242

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6242

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 0.5 MB 24x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.06 MB/core 16x more l2 cache per core
More cores 12 vs 8 4 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 8 4 more threads

Features Key features of the Exynos 5 Octa  vs Opteron 6242 

clock speed

Exynos 5 Octa
1.6 GHz
Opteron 6242
2.8 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Exynos 5 Octa  vs
Opteron 6242 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Octa core Duodeca core

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 93.44W

details

Exynos 5 Octa  vs
Opteron 6242 
Threads 8 12
L2 cache 0.5 MB 12 MB
L2 cache per core 0.06 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 32 nm
Samsung Exynos 5 Octa
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 6242
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus