Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (4412)

Reasons to consider the
Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (4412)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.4 GHz vs 0.93 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Newer May, 2012 vs Sep, 2007 Release date over 4 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.53 GHz vs 0.93 GHz Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz vs 0.93 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron M 523

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 523

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor

Features Key features of the Exynos 4 Quad (4412)  vs Celeron M 523 

clock speed

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Exynos 4 Quad (4412)  vs
Celeron M 523 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 0.93 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.53 GHz 0.93 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz 0.93 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.53 GHz 0.93 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 4.47W

details

Exynos 4 Quad (4412)  vs
Celeron M 523 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 1
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label ARM Mali-400 MP4 N/A
Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (4412)
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 523
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus