Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Samsung Exynos 4 Dual 45nm (4210)

Reasons to consider the
Samsung Exynos 4 Dual 45nm (4210)

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Mar, 2009 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Xeon X5560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon X5560

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz 2x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Exynos 4 Dual 45nm (4210) vs Xeon X5560

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Exynos 4 Dual 45nm (4210)  vs
Xeon X5560 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label ARM Mali-400 MP4 N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

Exynos 4 Dual 45nm (4210)  vs
Xeon X5560 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 77.19W
Samsung Exynos 4 Dual 45nm (4210)
Report a correction
Intel Xeon X5560
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus