Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of ST-Ericsson NovaThor L9540

Reasons to consider the
ST-Ericsson NovaThor L9540

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.85 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Newer Jul, 2012 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 6 years later
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo L7500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo L7500

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor

Features Key features of the NovaThor L9540  vs Core2 Duo L7500 

clock speed

NovaThor L9540
1.85 GHz
Core2 Duo L7500
1.6 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

NovaThor L9540  vs
Core2 Duo L7500 
Clock speed 1.85 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label PowerVR SGX 544 N/A

details

NovaThor L9540  vs
Core2 Duo L7500 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 2
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 13.81W
ST-Ericsson NovaThor L9540
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo L7500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus