Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of ST-Ericsson NovaThor A9500

Reasons to consider the
ST-Ericsson NovaThor A9500

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
Front view of Intel Pentium E2200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E2200

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 85% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor

Features Key features of the NovaThor A9500  vs Pentium E2200 

clock speed

NovaThor A9500
1.2 GHz
Pentium E2200
2.2 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

NovaThor A9500  vs
Pentium E2200 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label ARM Mali 400 MP N/A

details

NovaThor A9500  vs
Pentium E2200 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 2
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 52.81W
ST-Ericsson NovaThor A9500
Report a correction
Intel Pentium E2200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus