Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of ST-Ericsson Nova A9500

Reasons to consider the
ST-Ericsson Nova A9500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ST-Ericsson Nova A9500 vs the AMD A8 6410.

Front view of AMD A8 6410

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 6410

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 3 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Features Key features of the Nova A9500  vs A8 6410 

clock speed

Nova A9500
1.2 GHz
A8 6410
2 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Nova A9500  vs
A8 6410 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label ARM Mali 400 MP Radeon R5 series

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

Nova A9500  vs
A8 6410 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 12.19W
ST-Ericsson Nova A9500
Report a correction
AMD A8 6410
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus