Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Front view of Intel Celeron M 410

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 410

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.01 GHz vs 1.75 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064) vs Celeron M 410

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)  vs
Celeron M 410 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.46 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.75 GHz 2.01 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz 2.01 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 21.94W

details

Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)  vs
Celeron M 410 
Architecture ARM x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 65 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Adreno 320 N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (APQ8064)
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 410
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus