Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260)

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T5200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T5200

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.51 MB Around 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.26 MB/core Around 4x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.27 GHz vs 1.57 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260) vs Core2 Duo T5200

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260)  vs
Core2 Duo T5200 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.57 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.57 GHz 2.27 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 27.63W

details

Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260)  vs
Core2 Duo T5200 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.51 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.26 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Adreno 220 N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 (MSM8260)
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo T5200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus