Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Oct, 2008 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 4 years later
Front view of Intel Pentium 725

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 725

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.06 GHz vs 1.11 GHz Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)  vs Pentium 725 

clock speed

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)  vs
Pentium 725 
Clock speed 1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.11 GHz 2.06 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.11 GHz 2.06 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 6.09W

details

Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)  vs
Pentium 725 
Architecture ARM x86
Threads 1 1
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Adreno 200 N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)
Report a correction
Intel Pentium 725
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus