Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 1 GHz 4x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz vs 1.11 GHz Around 4.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 8.79 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 8.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 8 vs 1 7 more threads
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Oct, 2008 Release date over 4 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250) vs FX 8350

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 1 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Single core Octa core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.11 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 8.79 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.11 GHz 4.69 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 159.66W

details

Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)  vs
FX 8350 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 1 8
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Adreno 200 N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 (QSD8250)
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus