Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Front view of Intel Pentium 705

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 705

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Snapdragon 800  vs Pentium 705 

clock speed

Snapdragon 800
2.3 GHz
Pentium 705
1.5 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 800  vs
Pentium 705 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Adreno 330 N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

Snapdragon 800  vs
Pentium 705 
Architecture ARM x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 130 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 19.91W
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
Report a correction
Intel Pentium 705
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus