Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.46 GHz vs 2.27 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.27 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T5200

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T5200

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon 800 vs Core2 Duo T5200

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 800  vs
Core2 Duo T5200 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.46 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.27 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.46 GHz 2.27 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 27.63W

details

Snapdragon 800  vs
Core2 Duo T5200 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 65 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Adreno 330 N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo T5200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus