Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
Front view of Intel Atom Z3590

Intel Atom Z3590

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of Intel Atom Z3590

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3590

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.5 GHz vs 2.27 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Snapdragon 800  vs Atom Z3590 

overclocked clock speed (air)

Snapdragon 800
2.46 GHz
Atom Z3590
2.5 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Snapdragon 800
2.27 GHz
Atom Z3590
2.5 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Snapdragon 800  vs
Atom Z3590 
Cores Quad core Quad core

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.46 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.27 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.46 GHz 2.5 GHz

power consumption
Typical power consumption N/A N/A

details

 Snapdragon 800  vs
Atom Z3590 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 28 nm 22 nm

integrated graphics
GPU GPU None
Label Adreno 330 N/A

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3590
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss