Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 75% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Apple A7

Reasons to consider the
Apple A7

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Apple A7 vs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon 800 vs Apple A7

GeekBench

Apple A7
1,367

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 800  vs
Apple A7 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Adreno 330 PowerVR G6430

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel

details

Snapdragon 800  vs
Apple A7 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nms 28 nms
Architecture ARM ARMv8 64 bits

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
Report a correction
Apple A7
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 5 comments.
I know that, I think has Samsung produced most the chips for apple.
its 64bit, so it should be much faster for low core programs. programs that use 4 cores should go to snapdragon on an easy win.
Funny How no one seems to realize that the A7 chip is actually manufactured by Samsung.
On Apple Dix
Lol. Funny how the Snapdragon is still worse than the A7 in real world tests even though it has higher and more expensive specs. Apple does it better.
comments powered by Disqus