Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Report a correction
Much better SunSpider 0.9.1 score 822.6 ms vs 1,888 ms 2.3x better SunSpider 0.9.1 score
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Apr, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33) vs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 600.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon 600 vs Tegra 3 (T33)

SunSpider 0.9.1

Snapdragon 600
822.6 ms
Tegra 3 (T33)
1,888 ms

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 600  vs
Tegra 3 (T33) 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Adreno 320 ULP GeForce

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel

details

Snapdragon 600  vs
Tegra 3 (T33) 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 40 nm
Architecture ARM ARM

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
Report a correction
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus