Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 28 nms vs 40 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better SunSpider 0.9.1 score 822.6 ms vs 1,888 ms 2.3x better SunSpider 0.9.1 score
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Marginally newer Apr, 2013 vs Apr, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33) vs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 600.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon 600 vs Tegra 3 (T33)

SunSpider 0.9.1

Snapdragon 600
822.6 ms
Tegra 3 (T33)
1,888 ms

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 600  vs
Tegra 3 (T33) 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Adreno 320 ULP GeForce

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel

details

Snapdragon 600  vs
Tegra 3 (T33) 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nms 40 nms
Architecture ARM ARM

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
Report a correction
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus