Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Jan, 2005 Release date over 8 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Pentium 4 660

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 660

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.17 GHz vs 1.75 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.07 GHz vs 1.89 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon 600 vs Pentium 4 660

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 600  vs
Pentium 4 660 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.75 GHz 4.17 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.89 GHz 4.07 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz 4.17 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 93.44W

details

Snapdragon 600  vs
Pentium 4 660 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 90 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Adreno 320 N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
Report a correction
Intel Pentium 4 660
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus