Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Jun, 2012 Release date 10 months later
Front view of Intel Core i5 3470

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3470

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz Around 90% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.67 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.09 GHz vs 1.89 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon 600 vs Core i5 3470

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 600  vs
Core i5 3470 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.75 GHz 3.67 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.89 GHz 4.09 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz 3.67 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 86.05W

details

Snapdragon 600  vs
Core i5 3470 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 22 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Adreno 320 Intel® HD Graphics 2500

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3470
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus