Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Front view of Intel Celeron 460

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 460

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.89 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Snapdragon 600  vs Celeron 460 

clock speed

Snapdragon 600
1.7 GHz
Celeron 460
2.4 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Snapdragon 600
1.75 GHz
Celeron 460
3.57 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Snapdragon 600
1.89 GHz
Celeron 460
2.4 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 600  vs
Celeron 460 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.75 GHz 3.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.89 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz 3.57 GHz

details

Snapdragon 600  vs
Celeron 460 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 65 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 28.44W
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 460
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus