Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
Front view of AMD Turion X2 77

AMD Turion X2 77

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD Turion X2 77

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion X2 77

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Snapdragon 600  vs Turion X2 77 

clock speed

Snapdragon 600
1.7 GHz
Turion X2 77
2.3 GHz

L2 cache

Snapdragon 600
2 MB
Turion X2 77
1 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Snapdragon 600  vs
Turion X2 77 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

integrated graphics
GPU GPU None
Label Adreno 320 N/A

details

 Snapdragon 600  vs
Turion X2 77 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 65 nm

power consumption
Typical power consumption N/A 28.44W
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
Report a correction
AMD Turion X2 77
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss