Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer Apr, 2013 vs Mar, 2005 Release date over 8 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.89 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Turion 64 technology MT-30

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-30

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.06 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Features Key features of the Snapdragon 600  vs Turion 64 technology MT-30 

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 600  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-30 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.75 GHz 2.06 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.89 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz 2.06 GHz

details

Snapdragon 600  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-30 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 90 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 20.31W
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-30
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus