CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 400 (Dual) vs 4i

GPU

Benchmark graphics performance

GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt Classic (Offscreen)

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

Performance

Benchmark performance

GeekBench

Browser

Benchmark performance focused on browser usage

BrowserMark 2.0

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Default view of NVIDIA Tegra 4i

Reasons to consider the
NVIDIA Tegra 4i

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 90% higher clock speed
Much better GLBenchmark 2.5 egypt classic (Offscreen) score 57 fps vs 25 fps More than 2.2x better GLBenchmark 2.5 egypt classic (Offscreen) score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon 400 (Dual) vs Tegra 4i

GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt Offscreen

BrowserMark 2.0

GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt Classic (Offscreen)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 400 (Dual)  vs
Tegra 4i 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel

details

Snapdragon 400 (Dual)  vs
Tegra 4i 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 28 nm
Architecture ARM ARM

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)
Report a correction
NVIDIA Tegra 4i
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus