CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 400 (Dual) vs MT6589

GPU

Benchmark graphics performance

GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt Classic (Offscreen)

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

Performance

Benchmark performance

GeekBench

Browser

Benchmark performance focused on browser usage

BrowserMark 2.0

CPUBoss Score

GPU, Features, Performance and Browser

Winner
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual) 

CPUBoss recommends the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)  based on its gpu.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)

Report a correction
Significantly better GLBenchmark 2.5 egypt classic (Offscreen) score 25 fps vs 7.3 fps Around 3.5x better GLBenchmark 2.5 egypt classic (Offscreen) score
Default view of MediaTek MT6589

Reasons to consider the
MediaTek MT6589

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon 400 (Dual) vs MT6589

GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt Offscreen

BrowserMark 2.0

GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt Classic (Offscreen)

MT6589
7.3 fps

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 400 (Dual)  vs
MT6589 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Adreno 305 PowerVR Series5XT SGX544

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel

details

Snapdragon 400 (Dual)  vs
MT6589 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nm 28 nm
Architecture ARM ARM

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (Dual)
Report a correction
MediaTek MT6589
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus