Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Default view of Qualcomm Snapdragon 200

Reasons to consider the
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 vs the MediaTek MT6589.

Default view of MediaTek MT6589

Reasons to consider the
MediaTek MT6589

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the MediaTek MT6589 vs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Snapdragon 200 vs MT6589

GLBenchmark 2.1 Egypt Offscreen

Snapdragon 200
1.5 fps
MT6589
30 fps

BrowserMark 2.0

GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt Classic (Offscreen)

Snapdragon 200
7.4 fps
MT6589
7.3 fps

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Snapdragon 200  vs
MT6589 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1 GHz 1.21 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1 GHz 1.21 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A N/A

details

Snapdragon 200  vs
MT6589 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm
Architecture ARM ARM

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Adreno 203 PowerVR Series5XT SGX544

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
Report a correction
MediaTek MT6589
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus