Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 4

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 4

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 28 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Slightly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500K

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 5.04 GHz vs 1.91 GHz Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.11 GHz vs 1.91 GHz Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 4 vs Core i5 2500K

GeekBench

Tegra 4
4,148
Core i5 2500K
13,624

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 4  vs
Core i5 2500K 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is hyperthreaded No No

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.91 GHz 5.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.91 GHz 5.11 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.91 GHz 5.04 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 112.55W

details

Tegra 4  vs
Core i5 2500K 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nms 32 nms

gpu

GPU GPU GPU

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Nvidia Tegra 4
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2500K
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus