Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 4

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 4

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 1.9 GHz vs 0.9 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.7 GHz vs 0.9 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz vs 0.9 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron M 318

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 318

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron M 318 vs the Nvidia Tegra 4.

Features Key features of the Tegra 4  vs Celeron M 318 

clock speed

Tegra 4
1.9 GHz
Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz

L2 cache

Tegra 4
2 MB
Celeron M 318
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Tegra 4
1.7 GHz
Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Tegra 4
1.7 GHz
Celeron M 318
0.9 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 4  vs
Celeron M 318 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 0.9 GHz
Cores Penta core Single core

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.7 GHz 0.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz 0.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.7 GHz 0.9 GHz

details

Tegra 4  vs
Celeron M 318 
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
Manufacture process 28 nm 130 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 5.69W
Nvidia Tegra 4
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 318
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus