Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 4

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 4

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.9 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 28 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Slightly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.91 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.91 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 4 vs Celeron 847

GeekBench

Tegra 4
4,148
Celeron 847
2,817

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 4  vs
Celeron 847 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 1.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Is hyperthreaded No No

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.91 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.91 GHz 1.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.91 GHz 1.1 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 13.81W

details

Tegra 4  vs
Celeron 847 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 28 nms 32 nms

gpu

GPU GPU GPU

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Nvidia Tegra 4
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus