Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 4

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 4

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.9 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.7 GHz vs 1.41 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 2955U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 2955U

Report a correction
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 4 vs Celeron 2955U

GeekBench

Tegra 4
4,148

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 4  vs
Celeron 2955U 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Penta core Dual core
Is unlocked Yes No

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.41 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.7 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.7 GHz 1.41 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 12.19W

details

Tegra 4  vs
Celeron 2955U 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
Manufacture process 28 nm 22 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Nvidia Tegra 4
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 2955U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus