Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Report a correction
Marginally newer Apr, 2012 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 40 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 3 (T33) vs Core i5 2500K

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Core i5 2500K 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is hyperthreaded No No

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label ULP GeForce Intel® HD Graphics 3000
GPU clock speed 520 MHz 850 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel

details

Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Core i5 2500K 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nms 32 nms

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 112.55W
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2500K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus