Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Jan, 2005 Release date over 7 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Pentium 4 660

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 660

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz 2.2x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 3 (T33) vs Pentium 4 660


Specifications Full list of technical specs


Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Pentium 4 660 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

integrated graphics

Label ULP GeForce N/A
GPU clock speed 520 MHz N/A


Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Pentium 4 660 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 90 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 93.44W
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)
Report a correction
Intel Pentium 4 660
Report a correction


comments powered by Disqus