Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Report a correction
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz vs 520 MHz Around 65% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 3 (T33) vs Core i5 2500K


Specifications Full list of technical specs


Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Core i5 2500K 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

integrated graphics

Label ULP GeForce Intel® HD Graphics 3000
GPU clock speed 520 MHz 850 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel


Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Core i5 2500K 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 112.55W
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2500K
Report a correction


comments powered by Disqus