Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Higher GPU clock speed 520 MHz vs 400 MHz 30% higher GPU clock speed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Apr, 2011 Release date 11 months later
Front view of Intel Atom Z670

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z670

Report a correction
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 3 (T33) vs Atom Z670

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Atom Z670 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label ULP GeForce Integrated
GPU clock speed 520 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Single Channel Single Channel

details

Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Atom Z670 
Architecture ARM x86
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 45 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 2.44W
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z670
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus