Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Atom Z2760

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z2760

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Apr, 2012 Release date 5 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Tegra 3 (T33) vs Atom Z2760


Specifications Full list of technical specs


Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Atom Z2760 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

integrated graphics

Label ULP GeForce Integrated
GPU clock speed 520 MHz 533 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel


Tegra 3 (T33)  vs
Atom Z2760 
Architecture ARM x86
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 1.63W
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T33)
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z2760
Report a correction


comments powered by Disqus