Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30L)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30L)

Report a correction
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 416 MHz vs 200 MHz More than 2x higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel N3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Jan, 2012 Release date over 4 years later

Features Key features of the Tegra 3 (T30L)  vs N3350 

clock speed

Tegra 3 (T30L)
1.2 GHz
N3350
1.1 GHz

L2 cache

N3350
2 MB

gpu clock speed

Tegra 3 (T30L)
416 MHz
N3350
200 MHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 3 (T30L)  vs
N3350 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label ULP GeForce Intel® HD Graphics 500
GPU clock speed 416 MHz 200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel

details

Tegra 3 (T30L)  vs
N3350 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 14 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 4.88W
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30L)
Report a correction
Intel N3350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus