Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Sep, 2011 vs Jun, 2000 Release date over 11 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
Front view of Intel Pentium 750

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 750

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Tegra 3 (T30)  vs Pentium 750 

clock speed

Tegra 3 (T30)
1.4 GHz
Pentium 750
1.86 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 3 (T30)  vs
Pentium 750 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label ULP GeForce N/A
GPU clock speed 520 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

Tegra 3 (T30)  vs
Pentium 750 
Architecture ARM x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 90 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 21.94W
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30)
Report a correction
Intel Pentium 750
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus