Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30)

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30)

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD Turion X2 Ultra 85

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion X2 Ultra 85

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs ARM A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Tegra 3 (T30)  vs Turion X2 Ultra 85 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Tegra 3 (T30)  vs
Turion X2 Ultra 85 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label ULP GeForce N/A
GPU clock speed 520 MHz N/A

details

Tegra 3 (T30)  vs
Turion X2 Ultra 85 
Architecture ARM x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 40 nm 65 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 28.44W
Nvidia Tegra 3 (T30)
Report a correction
AMD Turion X2 Ultra 85
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus